His Excellency
Government of Afghanistan
Presidential Palace,
Kabul
Afghanistan
Through Mr Feroz Mohmand, Executive Assistant, President Spokesperson
Subject-Stop Killer Asbestos Fiber based Plants in Afghanistan
Sir,
Namaste from India!
I wish to draw your attention towards the resolutions of World Health Organisation (WHO) and International Labour Organisation (ILO) seeking elimination of future use of all forms of asbestos passed in 2005 and 2006 respectively.
I have come to know that the construction industry in your country is installing asbestos products such as sprayed-on fireproofing, pipe insulation, floor tiles, cement pipe and sheet, roofing felts and shingles, ceiling tiles, fire-resistant drywall, drywall joint compounds, and acoustical products.
I submit that asbestos fibers enter the body when a person inhales airborne particles that become embedded in the tissues of the respiratory systems. Exposure to asbestos can cause disabling or fatal diseases such as asbestosis, an emphysema-like condition; lung cancer; mesothelioma, a cancerous tumor that spreads rapidly in the cells of membranes covering the lungs. The symptoms of these diseases generally do not appear for 20 or more years after initial exposure. In view of such established hazards, the preventive option is not to use asbestos based products and opt for alternatives of asbestos.
On behalf of South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN) and Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI), I submit that there is an urgent for your government to ascertain the incurable diseases caused by asbestos especially in the aftermath of the verdict of ILO, WHO and WTO Appellate Body against the killer fibers of asbestos. Most of the northern countries have banned asbestos. It is high time Southern countries followed the path shown by Japan by taking steps to make their countries asbestos free.
It is well established in the medical community that asbestos is a carcinogen, meaning it can cause cancer since early 1950s. It was absolutely established that asbestos is a carcinogen by 1965. Despite this companies like Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) that caused world's worst industrial disaster in Bhopal, India and members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) have been playing word games avoided telling their customers that asbestos was a carcinogen.
I submit that Afghanistan Government should not ignore Indian Environment Ministry’s 19 page Vision Statement on Environment and Human Health (Para 4.3.1, page 12) which reads: “Alternatives to asbestos may be used to the extent possible and use of asbestos may be phased out” and the fact that mining of asbestos is banned in India on health grounds besides ban on trade in asbestos waste (dust and fibers). This statement is available on Ministry’s website.
The fact is that the fiber roofing sheets will be manufactured by using asbestos fibers which is banned in over 55 countries.
I submit that there is global awareness about the adverse effects of asbestos fibers. It affects everyone from the person mining it to the ultimate consumer. Clinical reports show that asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer can show up even 25 to 40 years after exposure to asbestos.
I submit that like elsewhere, in your country too, all cases of mesothelioma, an aggressive asbestos-related cancer are linked to asbestos exposure. All the medical colleges in India must teach that most cases of mesothelioma are related to enviro-occupational asbestos exposure that often occurred decades earlier in industries heavily dependent on asbestos-based products. These industries include construction, automobile repair and shipbuilding.
It is a glaring fact that the members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) and other industries based on killer fibers of asbestos are knowingly exposing workers, their families and consumers.
While the medical and financial relief (compensation) for the illness of workers, their families and consumers must be borne by the companies in question, in South Asia because of political patronage members of both CACPMA, ASCMA and others have escaped liability and have not been made accountable for deaths and diseases being caused by their products.
I submit that there are many factors that influence a person’s life expectancy. Mesothelioma, a asbestos related incurable disease is typically diagnosed in the late stages because it displays no serious symptoms before then. When diagnosed in the late stages, the average life expectancy is 8 months.
I submit that your government must identify and assist those who suffer from mesothelioma and other asbestos related diseases because they have the right to pursue financial compensation besides providing free legal consultation to present and potential victims and their families.
I submit that in an order dated January 21, 201, Hon’ble Supreme Court’s bench of Chief Justice of India Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar has observed in para 15, “the Government has already presented the Bill in Rajya Sabha. The statement of objects and reasons of this Bill specifically notices that the white asbestos is highly carcinogenic and it has been so reported by the World Health Organisation. In India, it is imported without any restriction while even its domestic use is not preferred by the exporting countries.” Rajya Sabha is the Upper House of Parliament of India.
The Bench of Chief Justice of India notes, “Canada and Russia are the biggest exporters of white asbestos. In 2007, Canada exported 95% of the white asbestos, it mined out of which 43% was shipped to India. In view of these facts, there is an urgent need for a total ban on the import and use of white asbestos and promote the use of alternative materials. The Bill is yet to be passed but it is clearly demonstrated that the Government is required to take effective steps to prevent hazardous impact of use of asbestos.”
I wish to inform you that the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a new factsheet on asbestos:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs343/en/index.html It re-iterates that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related
diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and specifically states that its strategy is particularly targeted at countries still using chrysotile asbestos. The factsheet notes that “more than 107 000 people die each year from asbestos-related lung cancer, mesothelioma and asbestosis resulting from occupational exposure.”
I submit that the work of WHO and International Labour Organization (ILO) must be taken cognisance of by your Government in its efforts towards elimination of asbestos-related diseases “by recognizing that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and by providing information about solutions for replacing asbestos with safer substitutes and developing economic and technological mechanisms to stimulate its replacement.”
I wish to draw your attention towards the New Delhi Declaration Seeking Elimination of cancer causing all forms of asbestos including Chrysotile from India which was adopted and endorsed by eminent scientists and doctors on 24th March, 2011. This happened at a Round Table which was organized immediately after the conclusion of International Conference on "Emerging Trends in Preventing Occupational Respiratory Diseases and Cancers in Workplace" at Maulana Azad Medical College, India that expressed grave concern about asbestos related diseases like lung cancer in the national capital.
The delegates at the Round Table discussed the asbestos policies in South Asia. These delegates shared their views and gave their valuable hand written notes so that it can be used in a credible way while strongly recommending the need for immediate ban on asbestos.
I wish to submit that during a visit to New Delhi in March 2011, Dr Alec Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada said, “We now have around 500 asbestos cancer cases every year in Ontario from a population of 13 million. In Ontario, we learned that safe use of asbestos is impossible. I urge you from the bottom of my heart, please do not make the same mistake as we made in Canada. Stop using asbestos and use a safe alternative.” The situation in Afghanistan with a population estimated at roughly 29 million people in all the 34 provinces is bound to be worse.
I submit that Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel said, “All form of asbestos kill.” Prof. Richter too was in New Delhi in March 2011.
It must be noted that “...there is no question that science has shown that Chrysotile causes asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. This is the conclusion of World Health Organisation. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, and other organizations that have no biases except for protecting people’s health,” said Prof. Arthur L Frank, MD, PhD, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US. He has 40 years of experience in dealing with asbestos diseases and he was in India to make a presentation at an International Conference on Occupational Health.
I submit that Collegium Ramazzini, a Italy based independent, international academy founded in 1982 by Irving J. Selikoff, Cesare Maltoni and other eminent scientists has called for the elimination asbestos of all kinds.
Presenting her views, Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, fellow of National Academy of Sciences, Dean, Integral University, Lucknow & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, Lucknow asserted, “The asbestos fibers will be the cause of exposure to our coming generations.” This merits your immediate attention.
It may noted that the conference was organised by Centre for Occupational Health, New Delhi supported by Union Ministry of Labour & Employment, ESI, DGMS and DGFASL in collaboration with Drexel University, US at Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi from 22-24 March, 2011.
The conference was deeply concerned about asbestos related diseases and the alarming rise of asbestos.
I also wish to draw your attention 5th Conference of the Parties (COP5) to the UN's Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade to be in Geneva wherein the fate of Chrysotile asbestos and some other chemicals will be be decided. The objective of the Rotterdam Convention “is to promote shared responsibility and cooperative efforts among Parties in the international trade of certain hazardous chemicals in order to protect human health and the environment from potential harm.”
In order to meet its objective, COP5 of Rotterdam Convention will consider the inclusion in Annex III of chrysotile asbestos under agenda item 5 c during the meeting scheduled for June 20-24, 2011.
It is noteworthy that the inclusion in Annex III does not equate to a prohibition of trade. It imposes requirements on exporting nations to provide basic information to consumers and customers environmental health hazards due to certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade.
I wish to inform you that there has been several attempts to include chrysotile asbestos (White Asbestos) on the prior informed consent list have failed due to the influence of asbestos producing countries who are compelled by their companies led by Quebec based Canadian companies who have succeeded in preventing any action on chrysotile asbestos being taken.
I submit that discussions on chrysotile asbestos at the COP 4 of Rotterdam Convention in 2008 took a decision to examine its listing at COP5 in June 2011. It is well known around the world that asbestos is hazardous to human health, and that there is no such thing as “safe use” of asbestos, just like there is no “safe cigarette”. It would do better to aim for growth through development of safe industries, and to lower the prices of substitutes, rather than promote use of this hazardous substance, opined Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel. This clearly underlines that white asbestos or chrysotile asbestos is a health hazard which is essentially what COP5 is to decide in Geneva.
In such a backdrop, in short, I request you to recommend steps on the following points:
· Urge Government of Afghanistan to Support Listing of Chrysotile (White Asbestos) in the PIC List of Rotterdam Convention
· Deny Consent to Establish to hazardous asbestos factory units in Afghanistan
· Create a Registry of Incurable Lung Cancers and Mesothelioma besides a registry of asbestos related diseases
· Start efforts to decontaminate asbestos laden buildings including schools and hospitals
· Create a building registry of those buildings and products which have asbestos.
· Include environmental and occupational health study in the medical education of all the medical colleges in Afghanistan
· Stop procurement of cancer causing asbestos based products in Afghanistan especially in the name of rehabilitation and resettlement
· Adequately compensate the victims of asbestos-related diseases, create a database of asbestos exposed people and victims as well besides providing legal and possible medical relief and taking preventive measures
I would be quite happy to share more details about the asbestos related incurable diseases.
Yours Sincerely
Gopal Krishna
Convener
Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI)
South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN)
New Delhi
Mb: 09818089660, 07739308480
E-mail:krishna2777@gmail.com
Blog:banasbestosindia.blogspot.com
Web: www.toxicswatch.com
Cc
Prof (Dr) Arthur Frank, Professor, Chair: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US,
Dr Aleck Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada,
Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel
Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel
Dr Lyle Hargrove, Chairperson, Occupational Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada
Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, Fellow, National Academy of Sciences, India & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, India
Dr. T.K. Joshi, Fellow, Collegium Ramazzini, Italy
Dr Barry Castleman, Author, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects
Prof. (Dr) Sanjay Chaturvedi, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, New Delhi
Mr Mohammad Faheem Dashty, Editor-in-Chief, Kabul Weekly
Mr Abdul Khaliq Fazal, former Minister of Public Works, Government of Afghanistan
Dr. James C. Dabhi, visiting Professor, Herat and Bamiyan Universities, Afghanistan
Mr Shaukat Zamani, Founder, Help Afghan Education, Afghanistan
Mr Sharif Ghalib, President, Canadian Afghan Council
Dr. Assem Akram, Author, Modern Afghan History
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
Stop Killer Asbestos Fiber based Plants in Sri Lanka
To
His Excellency
President Mahinda Rajapaksa
Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Colombo
May 2011
Subject-Stop Killer Asbestos Fiber based Plants in Sri Lanka
Sir,
I wish to draw your attention towards the news item "Committee to assess asbestos hazards" (13 May, 2011, Daily News), online petition seeking "Ban Use Of Lung Cancer Causing Asbestos in Sri Lanka and SARC Nations" endorsed by 113 people and "news item "BOI venture with Sigiri Roofings "published Daily News (7 August, 2009) and the misinformation campaigns like "Asbestos roofing sheet industry rejects "cancer causing" fears". I also seek your attention towards the resolutions of WHO and ILO seeking elimination of future use of all forms of asbestos passed in 2005 and 2006 respectively.
I welcome the possibility of Sri Lanka becoming the second Asian country after Japan to ban asbestos of all kinds after the consideration by Erudite Committee led by Dr Charitha Herath, Chairman, Central Environment Authority (CEA) of the world trends to abandon the use of asbestos due to their confirmed negative impacts and its prohibition in most of the industrialzed countries. This message is copied to globally recognised experts on enviro-occupational health effects of asbestos exposures in the health, medical and legal fields.
On behalf of South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN)and Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI), I appreciate the formation of the Erudite Committee to ascertain the incurable diseases caused by asbestos in the aftermath of the verdict of ILO, WHO and WTO Appellate Body against the killer fibers of asbestos. Most of the northern countries have banned asbestos. It is high time Southern countries followed the path shown by Japan by taking steps to make their countries asbestos free.
It is well established in the medical community that asbestos is a carcinogen, meaning it can cause cancer since early 1950s. It was absolutely established that asbestos is a carcinogen by 1965. Despite this companies like Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) that caused world's worst industrial disaster in Bhopal, India and members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) have been playing word games avoided telling their customers that asbestos was a carcinogen. The same is being done by Shri S.A. Bhimaraja, Chairman, Tamil Nadu based Nibhi Industries (Pvt) Ltd, formerly Vice-Chairman Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association of India (ASCMA) and formerly President, Ramco Industries. Industrialists like Shri Bhimaraja ignore Indian Environment Ministry’s 19 page Vision Statement on Environment and Human Health (Para 4.3.1, page 12) which reads: “Alternatives to asbestos may be used to the extent possible and use of asbestos may be phased out” and the fact that mining of asbestos is banned in India on health grounds besides ban on trade in asbestos waste (dust and fibers). This statement is available on Ministry’s website. Although it is quite ironical and sad that India is yet to ban manufacture and use of asbestos products.
I submit that Shri Bhimaraja has signed an investment agreement with Sigiri Roofings for a project to manufacture fibre roofing sheets and accessories by setting up a state-of-the-art manufacturing plant at Tharawilluwa, Battulu Oya in the Puttalam district. It likely to help manufacture around 7,500 metric tons monthly and its commercial operation was to commence in March 2010. The fact is that the fiber roofing sheets will be manufactured by using asbestos fibers which is banned in over 55 countries. I am aware of Shri Bhimaraja's asbestos factory in Gidha village, Bhojpur, Bihar, India that is facing villagers opposition.
I submit that there is global awareness about the adverse effects of asbestos fibers. It affects everyone from the person mining it to the ultimate consumer. Clinical reports show that asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer can show up even 25 to 40 years after exposure to asbestos.
I submit that like elsewhere, in our country too, all cases of mesothelioma, an aggressive asbestos-related cancer are linked to asbestos exposure. All the medical colleges in India must teach that most cases of mesothelioma are related to enviro-occupational asbestos exposure that often occurred decades earlier in industries heavily dependent on asbestos-based products. These industries include construction, automobile repair and shipbuilding.
It is a glaring fact that the members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) and other industries based on killer fibers of asbestos are knowingly exposing workers, their families and consumers.
While the medical and financial relief (compensation) for the illness of workers, their families and consumers must be borne by the companies in question, in South Asia because of political patronage members of both CACPMA, ASCMA and others have escaped liability and have not been made accountable for deaths and diseases being caused by their products.
I submit that there are many factors that influence a person’s life expectancy. Mesothelioma, a asbestos related incurable disease is typically diagnosed in the late stages because it displays no serious symptoms before then. When diagnosed in the late stages, the average life expectancy is 8 months.
I submit that your government must identify and assist those who suffer from mesothelioma and other asbestos related diseases because they have the right to pursue financial compensation besides providing free legal consultation to present and potential victims and their families.
I submit that in an order dated January 21, 201, Hon’ble Supreme Court’s bench of Chief Justice of India Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar has observed in para 15, “the Government has already presented the Bill in Rajya Sabha. The statement of objects and reasons of this Bill specifically notices that the white asbestos is highly carcinogenic and it has been so reported by the World Health Organisation. In India, it is imported without any restriction while even its domestic use is not preferred by the exporting countries.” Rajya Sabha is the Upper House of Parliament of India.
The Bench of Chief Justice of India notes, “Canada and Russia are the biggest exporters of white asbestos. In 2007, Canada exported 95% of the white asbestos, it mined out of which 43% was shipped to India. In view of these facts, there is an urgent need for a total ban on the import and use of white asbestos and promote the use of alternative materials. The Bill is yet to be passed but it is clearly demonstrated that the Government is required to take effective steps to prevent hazardous impact of use of asbestos.”
I wish to inform you that the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a new factsheet on asbestos:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs343/en/index.html It re-iterates that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related
diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and specifically states that its strategy is particularly targeted at countries still using chrysotile asbestos. The factsheet notes that “more than 107 000 people die each year from asbestos-related lung cancer, mesothelioma and asbestosis resulting from occupational exposure.”
I submit that the work of WHO and International Labour Organization (ILO) must be taken cognisance of by your Government in its efforts towards elimination of asbestos-related diseases “by recognizing that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and by providing information about solutions for replacing asbestos with safer substitutes and developing economic and technological mechanisms to stimulate its replacement.”
I wish to draw your attention towards the New Delhi Declaration Seeking Elimination of cancer causing all forms of asbestos including Chrysotile from India which was adopted and endorsed by eminent scientists and doctors on 24th March, 2011. This happened at a Round Table which was organized immediately after the conclusion of International Conference on "Emerging Trends in Preventing Occupational Respiratory Diseases and Cancers in Workplace" at Maulana Azad Medical College, India that expressed grave concern about asbestos related diseases like lung cancer in the national capital.
The delegates at the Round Table discussed the asbestos policies in South Asia. These delegates shared their views and gave their valuable hand written notes so that it can be used in a credible way while strongly recommending the need for immediate ban on asbestos.
I wish to submit that during a visit to New Delhi in March 2011, Dr Alec Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada said, “We now have around 500 asbestos cancer cases every year in Ontario from a population of 13 million. In Ontario, we learned that safe use of asbestos is impossible. I urge you from the bottom of my heart, please do not make the same mistake as we made in Canada. Stop using asbestos and use a safe alternative.” The situation in Sri Lanka with a population of about 20 million is bound to be worse.
I submit that Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel said, “All form of asbestos kill.” Prof. Richter too was in New Delhi in March 2011.
It must be noted that “...there is no question that science has shown that Chrysotile causes asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. This is the conclusion of World Health Organisation. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, and other organizations that have no biases except for protecting people’s health,” said Prof. Arthur L Frank, MD, PhD, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US. He has 40 years of experience in dealing with asbestos diseases and he was in India to make a presentation at an International Conference on Occupational Health.
I submit that Collegium Ramazzini, a Italy based independent, international academy founded in 1982 by Irving J. Selikoff, Cesare Maltoni and other eminent scientists has called for the elimination asbestos of all kinds.
Presenting her views, Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, fellow of National Academy of Sciences, Dean, Integral University, Lucknow & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, Lucknow asserted, “The asbestos fibers will be the cause of exposure to our coming generations.” This merits your immediate attention.
It may noted that the conference was organised by Centre for Occupational Health, New Delhi supported by Union Ministry of Labour & Employment, ESI, DGMS and DGFASL in collaboration with Drexel University, US at Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi from 22-24 March, 2011.
The conference was deeply concerned about asbestos related diseases and the alarming rise of asbestos.
I also wish to draw your attention 5th Conference of the Parties (COP5) to the UN's Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade to be in Geneva wherein the fate of Chrysotile asbestos and some other chemicals will be be decided. The objective of the Rotterdam Convention “is to promote shared responsibility and cooperative efforts among Parties in the international trade of certain hazardous chemicals in order to protect human health and the environment from potential harm.”
In order to meet its objective, COP5 of Rotterdam Convention will consider the inclusion in Annex III of chrysotile asbestos under agenda item 5 c during the meeting scheduled for June 20-24, 2011.
It is noteworthy that the inclusion in Annex III does not equate to a prohibition of trade. It imposes requirements on exporting nations to provide basic information to consumers and customers environmental health hazards due to certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade.
I wish to inform you that there has been several attempts to include chrysotile asbestos (White Asbestos) on the prior informed consent list have failed due to the influence of asbestos producing countries who are compelled by their companies led by Quebec based Canadian companies who have succeeded in preventing any action on chrysotile asbestos being taken.
I submit that discussions on chrysotile asbestos at the COP 4 of Rotterdam Convention in 2008 took a decision to examine its listing at COP5 in June 2011. It is well known around the world that asbestos is hazardous to human health, and that there is no such thing as “safe use” of asbestos, just like there is no “safe cigarette”. It would do better to aim for growth through development of safe industries, and to lower the prices of substitutes, rather than promote use of this hazardous substance, opined Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel. This clearly underlines that white asbestos or chrysotile asbestos is a health hazard which is essentially what COP5 is to decide in Geneva.
In such a backdrop, in short, I request you to recommend steps on the following points:
· Urge Government of Sri Lanka to Support Listing of Chrysotile (White Asbestos) in the PIC List of Rotterdam Convention
· Deny Consent to Establish to hazardous asbestos factory units in Sri Lanka
· Create a Registry of Incurable Lung Cancers and Mesothelioma besides a registry of asbestos related diseases
· Start efforts to decontaminate asbestos laden buildings including schools and hospitals
· Create a building registry of those buildings and products which have asbestos.
· Include environmental and occupational health study in the medical education of all the medical colleges in Sri Lanka
· Stop procurement of cancer causing asbestos based products in Sri Lanka
· Adequately compensate the victims of asbestos-related diseases, create a database of asbestos exposed people and victims as well besides providing legal and possible medical relief and taking preventive measures
I would be quite happy to share more details about the asbestos related incurable diseases.
Yours Sincerely
Gopal Krishna
Convener
Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI)
South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN)
New Delhi
Mb: 09818089660, 07739308480
E-mail:krishna2777@gmail.com
Blog:banasbestosindia.blogspot.com
Web: www.toxicswatch.com
Cc
Prime Minister's Office, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Ministry of Labour Relations, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr Charitha Herath, Chairman, Central Environment Authority (CEA), Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr. Hemantha D. Wickramatillake, Fellow , Collegium Ramazzini, Italy
Dr C. K. Shanmugarajah, Director, Env. & Occupational Health, Ministry of Health, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr Shelton Chandrasiri, Provincial Director of Health Services, Uva Province, Sri Lanka
Dr Nida Besbelli, International Programme on Chemical Safety (PHE/PCS), WHO HQ, Geneva
Dr Kalpana Balakrishnan, Associate Professor & Head, Environmental Engineering Cell, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, India
Dr Gerry Eijkemans, Occupational Health Programme, WHO HQ, Geneva
Dr Cherian Varghese, NPO, Office of WR-India
Prof (Dr) Arthur Frank, Professor, Chair: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US,
Dr Aleck Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada,
Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel
Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel
Dr Lyle Hargrove, Chairperson, Occupational Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada
Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, Fellow, National Academy of Sciences, India & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, India
Dr. T.K. Joshi, Fellow, Collegium Ramazzini, Italy
Dr Barry Castleman, Author, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects
Prof. (Dr) Sanjay Chaturvedi, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
Editor-in-Chief, Daily News, Sri Lanka
His Excellency
President Mahinda Rajapaksa
Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Colombo
May 2011
Subject-Stop Killer Asbestos Fiber based Plants in Sri Lanka
Sir,
I wish to draw your attention towards the news item "Committee to assess asbestos hazards" (13 May, 2011, Daily News), online petition seeking "Ban Use Of Lung Cancer Causing Asbestos in Sri Lanka and SARC Nations" endorsed by 113 people and "news item "BOI venture with Sigiri Roofings "published Daily News (7 August, 2009) and the misinformation campaigns like "Asbestos roofing sheet industry rejects "cancer causing" fears". I also seek your attention towards the resolutions of WHO and ILO seeking elimination of future use of all forms of asbestos passed in 2005 and 2006 respectively.
I welcome the possibility of Sri Lanka becoming the second Asian country after Japan to ban asbestos of all kinds after the consideration by Erudite Committee led by Dr Charitha Herath, Chairman, Central Environment Authority (CEA) of the world trends to abandon the use of asbestos due to their confirmed negative impacts and its prohibition in most of the industrialzed countries. This message is copied to globally recognised experts on enviro-occupational health effects of asbestos exposures in the health, medical and legal fields.
On behalf of South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN)and Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI), I appreciate the formation of the Erudite Committee to ascertain the incurable diseases caused by asbestos in the aftermath of the verdict of ILO, WHO and WTO Appellate Body against the killer fibers of asbestos. Most of the northern countries have banned asbestos. It is high time Southern countries followed the path shown by Japan by taking steps to make their countries asbestos free.
It is well established in the medical community that asbestos is a carcinogen, meaning it can cause cancer since early 1950s. It was absolutely established that asbestos is a carcinogen by 1965. Despite this companies like Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) that caused world's worst industrial disaster in Bhopal, India and members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) have been playing word games avoided telling their customers that asbestos was a carcinogen. The same is being done by Shri S.A. Bhimaraja, Chairman, Tamil Nadu based Nibhi Industries (Pvt) Ltd, formerly Vice-Chairman Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association of India (ASCMA) and formerly President, Ramco Industries. Industrialists like Shri Bhimaraja ignore Indian Environment Ministry’s 19 page Vision Statement on Environment and Human Health (Para 4.3.1, page 12) which reads: “Alternatives to asbestos may be used to the extent possible and use of asbestos may be phased out” and the fact that mining of asbestos is banned in India on health grounds besides ban on trade in asbestos waste (dust and fibers). This statement is available on Ministry’s website. Although it is quite ironical and sad that India is yet to ban manufacture and use of asbestos products.
I submit that Shri Bhimaraja has signed an investment agreement with Sigiri Roofings for a project to manufacture fibre roofing sheets and accessories by setting up a state-of-the-art manufacturing plant at Tharawilluwa, Battulu Oya in the Puttalam district. It likely to help manufacture around 7,500 metric tons monthly and its commercial operation was to commence in March 2010. The fact is that the fiber roofing sheets will be manufactured by using asbestos fibers which is banned in over 55 countries. I am aware of Shri Bhimaraja's asbestos factory in Gidha village, Bhojpur, Bihar, India that is facing villagers opposition.
I submit that there is global awareness about the adverse effects of asbestos fibers. It affects everyone from the person mining it to the ultimate consumer. Clinical reports show that asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer can show up even 25 to 40 years after exposure to asbestos.
I submit that like elsewhere, in our country too, all cases of mesothelioma, an aggressive asbestos-related cancer are linked to asbestos exposure. All the medical colleges in India must teach that most cases of mesothelioma are related to enviro-occupational asbestos exposure that often occurred decades earlier in industries heavily dependent on asbestos-based products. These industries include construction, automobile repair and shipbuilding.
It is a glaring fact that the members of Chrysotile Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (CACPMA), Asbestos Cement Products Manufacturers Association (ASCMA) and other industries based on killer fibers of asbestos are knowingly exposing workers, their families and consumers.
While the medical and financial relief (compensation) for the illness of workers, their families and consumers must be borne by the companies in question, in South Asia because of political patronage members of both CACPMA, ASCMA and others have escaped liability and have not been made accountable for deaths and diseases being caused by their products.
I submit that there are many factors that influence a person’s life expectancy. Mesothelioma, a asbestos related incurable disease is typically diagnosed in the late stages because it displays no serious symptoms before then. When diagnosed in the late stages, the average life expectancy is 8 months.
I submit that your government must identify and assist those who suffer from mesothelioma and other asbestos related diseases because they have the right to pursue financial compensation besides providing free legal consultation to present and potential victims and their families.
I submit that in an order dated January 21, 201, Hon’ble Supreme Court’s bench of Chief Justice of India Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan and Justice Swatanter Kumar has observed in para 15, “the Government has already presented the Bill in Rajya Sabha. The statement of objects and reasons of this Bill specifically notices that the white asbestos is highly carcinogenic and it has been so reported by the World Health Organisation. In India, it is imported without any restriction while even its domestic use is not preferred by the exporting countries.” Rajya Sabha is the Upper House of Parliament of India.
The Bench of Chief Justice of India notes, “Canada and Russia are the biggest exporters of white asbestos. In 2007, Canada exported 95% of the white asbestos, it mined out of which 43% was shipped to India. In view of these facts, there is an urgent need for a total ban on the import and use of white asbestos and promote the use of alternative materials. The Bill is yet to be passed but it is clearly demonstrated that the Government is required to take effective steps to prevent hazardous impact of use of asbestos.”
I wish to inform you that the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a new factsheet on asbestos:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs343/en/index.html It re-iterates that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related
diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and specifically states that its strategy is particularly targeted at countries still using chrysotile asbestos. The factsheet notes that “more than 107 000 people die each year from asbestos-related lung cancer, mesothelioma and asbestosis resulting from occupational exposure.”
I submit that the work of WHO and International Labour Organization (ILO) must be taken cognisance of by your Government in its efforts towards elimination of asbestos-related diseases “by recognizing that the most efficient way to eliminate asbestos-related diseases is to stop the use of all types of asbestos and by providing information about solutions for replacing asbestos with safer substitutes and developing economic and technological mechanisms to stimulate its replacement.”
I wish to draw your attention towards the New Delhi Declaration Seeking Elimination of cancer causing all forms of asbestos including Chrysotile from India which was adopted and endorsed by eminent scientists and doctors on 24th March, 2011. This happened at a Round Table which was organized immediately after the conclusion of International Conference on "Emerging Trends in Preventing Occupational Respiratory Diseases and Cancers in Workplace" at Maulana Azad Medical College, India that expressed grave concern about asbestos related diseases like lung cancer in the national capital.
The delegates at the Round Table discussed the asbestos policies in South Asia. These delegates shared their views and gave their valuable hand written notes so that it can be used in a credible way while strongly recommending the need for immediate ban on asbestos.
I wish to submit that during a visit to New Delhi in March 2011, Dr Alec Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada said, “We now have around 500 asbestos cancer cases every year in Ontario from a population of 13 million. In Ontario, we learned that safe use of asbestos is impossible. I urge you from the bottom of my heart, please do not make the same mistake as we made in Canada. Stop using asbestos and use a safe alternative.” The situation in Sri Lanka with a population of about 20 million is bound to be worse.
I submit that Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel said, “All form of asbestos kill.” Prof. Richter too was in New Delhi in March 2011.
It must be noted that “...there is no question that science has shown that Chrysotile causes asbestosis, lung cancer and mesothelioma. This is the conclusion of World Health Organisation. The International Agency for Research on Cancer, and other organizations that have no biases except for protecting people’s health,” said Prof. Arthur L Frank, MD, PhD, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US. He has 40 years of experience in dealing with asbestos diseases and he was in India to make a presentation at an International Conference on Occupational Health.
I submit that Collegium Ramazzini, a Italy based independent, international academy founded in 1982 by Irving J. Selikoff, Cesare Maltoni and other eminent scientists has called for the elimination asbestos of all kinds.
Presenting her views, Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, fellow of National Academy of Sciences, Dean, Integral University, Lucknow & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, Lucknow asserted, “The asbestos fibers will be the cause of exposure to our coming generations.” This merits your immediate attention.
It may noted that the conference was organised by Centre for Occupational Health, New Delhi supported by Union Ministry of Labour & Employment, ESI, DGMS and DGFASL in collaboration with Drexel University, US at Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi from 22-24 March, 2011.
The conference was deeply concerned about asbestos related diseases and the alarming rise of asbestos.
I also wish to draw your attention 5th Conference of the Parties (COP5) to the UN's Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade to be in Geneva wherein the fate of Chrysotile asbestos and some other chemicals will be be decided. The objective of the Rotterdam Convention “is to promote shared responsibility and cooperative efforts among Parties in the international trade of certain hazardous chemicals in order to protect human health and the environment from potential harm.”
In order to meet its objective, COP5 of Rotterdam Convention will consider the inclusion in Annex III of chrysotile asbestos under agenda item 5 c during the meeting scheduled for June 20-24, 2011.
It is noteworthy that the inclusion in Annex III does not equate to a prohibition of trade. It imposes requirements on exporting nations to provide basic information to consumers and customers environmental health hazards due to certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade.
I wish to inform you that there has been several attempts to include chrysotile asbestos (White Asbestos) on the prior informed consent list have failed due to the influence of asbestos producing countries who are compelled by their companies led by Quebec based Canadian companies who have succeeded in preventing any action on chrysotile asbestos being taken.
I submit that discussions on chrysotile asbestos at the COP 4 of Rotterdam Convention in 2008 took a decision to examine its listing at COP5 in June 2011. It is well known around the world that asbestos is hazardous to human health, and that there is no such thing as “safe use” of asbestos, just like there is no “safe cigarette”. It would do better to aim for growth through development of safe industries, and to lower the prices of substitutes, rather than promote use of this hazardous substance, opined Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel. This clearly underlines that white asbestos or chrysotile asbestos is a health hazard which is essentially what COP5 is to decide in Geneva.
In such a backdrop, in short, I request you to recommend steps on the following points:
· Urge Government of Sri Lanka to Support Listing of Chrysotile (White Asbestos) in the PIC List of Rotterdam Convention
· Deny Consent to Establish to hazardous asbestos factory units in Sri Lanka
· Create a Registry of Incurable Lung Cancers and Mesothelioma besides a registry of asbestos related diseases
· Start efforts to decontaminate asbestos laden buildings including schools and hospitals
· Create a building registry of those buildings and products which have asbestos.
· Include environmental and occupational health study in the medical education of all the medical colleges in Sri Lanka
· Stop procurement of cancer causing asbestos based products in Sri Lanka
· Adequately compensate the victims of asbestos-related diseases, create a database of asbestos exposed people and victims as well besides providing legal and possible medical relief and taking preventive measures
I would be quite happy to share more details about the asbestos related incurable diseases.
Yours Sincerely
Gopal Krishna
Convener
Ban Asbestos Network of India (BANI)
South Asian Ban Asbestos Network (SABAN)
New Delhi
Mb: 09818089660, 07739308480
E-mail:krishna2777@gmail.com
Blog:banasbestosindia.blogspot.com
Web: www.toxicswatch.com
Cc
Prime Minister's Office, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Ministry of Labour Relations, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr Charitha Herath, Chairman, Central Environment Authority (CEA), Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr. Hemantha D. Wickramatillake, Fellow , Collegium Ramazzini, Italy
Dr C. K. Shanmugarajah, Director, Env. & Occupational Health, Ministry of Health, Government of Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka
Dr Shelton Chandrasiri, Provincial Director of Health Services, Uva Province, Sri Lanka
Dr Nida Besbelli, International Programme on Chemical Safety (PHE/PCS), WHO HQ, Geneva
Dr Kalpana Balakrishnan, Associate Professor & Head, Environmental Engineering Cell, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Chennai, India
Dr Gerry Eijkemans, Occupational Health Programme, WHO HQ, Geneva
Dr Cherian Varghese, NPO, Office of WR-India
Prof (Dr) Arthur Frank, Professor, Chair: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University School of Public Health, US,
Dr Aleck Farquhar, Managing Director, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada,
Professor Elihu D Richter MD MPH, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Israel
Dr Yael Stein, MD, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel
Dr Lyle Hargrove, Chairperson, Occupational Clinics for Ontario Workers, Canada
Prof (Dr) Qamar Rahman, Fellow, National Academy of Sciences, India & former Deputy Director, Industrial Toxicology Research Centre, India
Dr. T.K. Joshi, Fellow, Collegium Ramazzini, Italy
Dr Barry Castleman, Author, Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects
Prof. (Dr) Sanjay Chaturvedi, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
Editor-in-Chief, Daily News, Sri Lanka
Thursday, 25 June 2009
URGENT APPEAL:CANADA EXPORTING TOXIC ASBESTOS
An international action being organized for July 1 (Canada Day) to shame Canada into stopping its export of deadly asbestos to developing countries. Canada is the lead global propagandist for the asbestos industry.
ACTION: On July 1(or a nearby date), please sign and send in the attached World Appeal to Canada by fax, email or hand deliver it to the Canadian embassy or consulate in your country. You can get the contact info for the Canadian embassy in your country at the following website
http://www.international.gc.ca/ciw-cdm/embassies-ambassades.aspx?lang=eng Or you can email Kathleen Ruff for it at kruff@bulkely.net
There will be demonstrations outside the Canadian embassy in Washington, DC, in Sydney, Australia and in Paris, France. If you would like more information about these demonstrations, or if you would be willing to demonstrate outside a Canadian embassy in your country, even if very briefly, or if you have any other questions, please email Kathleen at the email above.
EMBASSY CONTACT INFO FOR FOLLOWING COUNTRIES:
1) France. Fax: (011-33-1) 44.43.29.99;
2) Germany. Fax: (49 30) 20312-121; email brlin-pa@international.gc.ca
3) India. Fax: 91 (11) 4178-2020; email delhi@international.gc.ca
4) United Kingdom. Fax: (0207) 258-6476; email ldn.publicaffairs@international.gc.ca
5) U.S. Fax: (202) 682-7726;
If anyone can find the email address for the embassy in France & the US, please send it to me.
URGENT APPEAL
TO CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER
ON CANADA DAY, JULY 1, 2009
WHEREAS:
- Canada is the only western country exporting asbestos
- The science is irrefutable that chrysotile asbestos (the only form of asbestos still sold commercially) causes cancer and other deadly diseases
- Canada has virtually banned asbestos itself and exports 95% of its asbestos to developing countries
- Canada is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to remove asbestos from the Parliament Buildings and homes and schools across Canada
- In April this year your government gave yet another quarter of a million dollars to the Chrysotile Institute to promote asbestos in developing countries
- As shown in the recent CBC The National documentary Canada's Ugly Secret, Canada's asbestos is being used overseas under appallingly dangerous conditions
- A government of Quebec report shows a 100% failure rate to practise safety standards in the tiny numbers of industrial sites using asbestos in Quebec, showing that Canada’s “safe use” claim is a myth, even in an advanced, regulated, wealthy, technological society like Canada itself
- The World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization, the 160 million members of the International Trade Union Confederation in 155 countries, the World Bank and every independent scientific organization that has examined asbestos have all called for an end to the sale and use of asbestos as the only way to end the unnecessary tragedy of asbestos disease
- Bill C-399, tabled in the House of Commons on June 1, 2009, prohibits the commercial mining of any form of asbestos
WE THEREFORE CALL ON YOUR GOVERNMENT TO:
- END THE SHAME OF CANADA’S ASBESTOS EXPORT
- PUT PEOPLE’S LIVES AHEAD OF POLITICAL AMBITION
- CELEBRATE CANADA DAY BY SUPPORTING BILL C-399 TO BAN ASBESTOS
SIGNED:
NAME:
ORGANIZATION (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
ACTION: On July 1(or a nearby date), please sign and send in the attached World Appeal to Canada by fax, email or hand deliver it to the Canadian embassy or consulate in your country. You can get the contact info for the Canadian embassy in your country at the following website
http://www.international.gc.ca/ciw-cdm/embassies-ambassades.aspx?lang=eng Or you can email Kathleen Ruff for it at kruff@bulkely.net
There will be demonstrations outside the Canadian embassy in Washington, DC, in Sydney, Australia and in Paris, France. If you would like more information about these demonstrations, or if you would be willing to demonstrate outside a Canadian embassy in your country, even if very briefly, or if you have any other questions, please email Kathleen at the email above.
EMBASSY CONTACT INFO FOR FOLLOWING COUNTRIES:
1) France. Fax: (011-33-1) 44.43.29.99;
2) Germany. Fax: (49 30) 20312-121; email brlin-pa@international.gc.ca
3) India. Fax: 91 (11) 4178-2020; email delhi@international.gc.ca
4) United Kingdom. Fax: (0207) 258-6476; email ldn.publicaffairs@international.gc.ca
5) U.S. Fax: (202) 682-7726;
If anyone can find the email address for the embassy in France & the US, please send it to me.
URGENT APPEAL
TO CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER
ON CANADA DAY, JULY 1, 2009
WHEREAS:
- Canada is the only western country exporting asbestos
- The science is irrefutable that chrysotile asbestos (the only form of asbestos still sold commercially) causes cancer and other deadly diseases
- Canada has virtually banned asbestos itself and exports 95% of its asbestos to developing countries
- Canada is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to remove asbestos from the Parliament Buildings and homes and schools across Canada
- In April this year your government gave yet another quarter of a million dollars to the Chrysotile Institute to promote asbestos in developing countries
- As shown in the recent CBC The National documentary Canada's Ugly Secret, Canada's asbestos is being used overseas under appallingly dangerous conditions
- A government of Quebec report shows a 100% failure rate to practise safety standards in the tiny numbers of industrial sites using asbestos in Quebec, showing that Canada’s “safe use” claim is a myth, even in an advanced, regulated, wealthy, technological society like Canada itself
- The World Health Organization, the International Labour Organization, the 160 million members of the International Trade Union Confederation in 155 countries, the World Bank and every independent scientific organization that has examined asbestos have all called for an end to the sale and use of asbestos as the only way to end the unnecessary tragedy of asbestos disease
- Bill C-399, tabled in the House of Commons on June 1, 2009, prohibits the commercial mining of any form of asbestos
WE THEREFORE CALL ON YOUR GOVERNMENT TO:
- END THE SHAME OF CANADA’S ASBESTOS EXPORT
- PUT PEOPLE’S LIVES AHEAD OF POLITICAL AMBITION
- CELEBRATE CANADA DAY BY SUPPORTING BILL C-399 TO BAN ASBESTOS
SIGNED:
NAME:
ORGANIZATION (if applicable):
ADDRESS:
Sunday, 21 June 2009
Canada's Ugly Secret
Canada's overseas sales of asbestos breathing new life into a dying industry - but may also be making exposed workers sick. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) exposed Canada's Ugly Secret on 10th June.
Views on the CBC Documentary
Anyone else watch the CBC documentary on asbestos that aired on The National tonight? Holy Christ, India, which imports Canadian asbestos, is setting itself up for a major health care crisis in the years ahead, as virtually every building, public and private, has Canadian asbestos in it. Melissa Fung, who did the documentary, could not find one person in the industry here (in Thetford Mines, Quebec) or in the federal government - which heavily subsidizes this industry - and Lisa Raitt is the Minister responsible - to appear on camera. Canada should be ashamed of itself for exporting death to Third World and developing nations such as India and others!
The height of hyprocrisy:
At the same time Canada is paying to have asbestos removed from federal buildings on Parliament Hill, Canada is subsidizing asbestos production in Thetford Mines, Quebec, for export to India and other countries.
One wonders if the Indian (and other) governments will soon begin lawsuits against Canada to recover the cost of medical care for ailments (cancer and respiratory diseases) caused by Canadian asbestos used in these countries?
Isn't India responsible for making and enforcing health and safety laws in India? Given that it is possible to use asbestos safely, why should India's desire for asbestos be a cause for concern among Quebeckers, or anyone else, for that matter?
Views on the CBC Documentary
Anyone else watch the CBC documentary on asbestos that aired on The National tonight? Holy Christ, India, which imports Canadian asbestos, is setting itself up for a major health care crisis in the years ahead, as virtually every building, public and private, has Canadian asbestos in it. Melissa Fung, who did the documentary, could not find one person in the industry here (in Thetford Mines, Quebec) or in the federal government - which heavily subsidizes this industry - and Lisa Raitt is the Minister responsible - to appear on camera. Canada should be ashamed of itself for exporting death to Third World and developing nations such as India and others!
The height of hyprocrisy:
At the same time Canada is paying to have asbestos removed from federal buildings on Parliament Hill, Canada is subsidizing asbestos production in Thetford Mines, Quebec, for export to India and other countries.
One wonders if the Indian (and other) governments will soon begin lawsuits against Canada to recover the cost of medical care for ailments (cancer and respiratory diseases) caused by Canadian asbestos used in these countries?
Isn't India responsible for making and enforcing health and safety laws in India? Given that it is possible to use asbestos safely, why should India's desire for asbestos be a cause for concern among Quebeckers, or anyone else, for that matter?
Saturday, 30 May 2009
Asian Govts Expose Citizens to Asbestos
Asian governments neglecting their citizens health from the environmental and occupational hazards of asbestos
China, India, Japan, Indonesia, and South Korea are among the world’s top 10 asbestos consumers. But consumption in Japan and South Korea is decreasing while it is increasing in most other Asian countries. This reflects the broad picture: rich Asian countries are reducing asbestos consumption while the poorer ones are increasing it.
Types of asbestos being used
The three most common types of asbestos are:
- Chrysotile: This is the technical name of white asbestos. It accounts for as much as 90% of asbestos produced / exported / used worldwide. Pro-asbestos lobbies insist that this type of asbestos is not harmful if used in a controlled manner, but facts don’t support this theory.
- Amosite: This is brown or gray in color and is not widely used.
- Crocidolite (Riebeckite): This is blue in color and very little used.
It follows from the above that white asbestos is the world’s most widely available and used asbestos. Most references to asbestos are usually about white asbestos.
Diseases caused by asbestos
The main asbestos-related diseases are: asbestosis, and mesothelioma:
- Asbestosis: This is a non-malignant disease that affects both lungs. If exposure to asbestos dust continues, it can deteriorate to malignant mesothelioma.
- Mesothelioma: This is a malignant, usually fatal disease that affects the mesotheleum, the protective lining over the body’s internal organs (usually lungs). The disease is usually detected 10-50 decades after the causative asbestos exposure and survival period is less than two years post-detection in most cases.
Consumption of Asbestos in Asia
Following is an indicative picture of the asbestos consumption scene in some countries of Asia (2004 statistics sourced from Medscape, part of WebMD Health Professional Network):
Japan:
Asbestos consumption decreasing. Per capita consumption: 0.6kgAfter rampant use of asbestos in post-World War II reconstruction, Japan curtailed its asbestos consumption by 90% since October 2004.
With the damage already done, deaths from pleural mesothelioma will peak in 2030, a good 60 years after imports of asbestos peaked in the country।
| Thailand: Vietnam: China: India: Pakistan:
South Korea: Malaysia: Indonesia: Philippines: Singapore: Taiwan: |
| Conclusion Asia is a continent of stark contrasts, with Japan and South Korea at the top of the ladder and some of the world’s poorest countries at the bottom rung. The trend is that the rich countries are steadily decreasing their use of asbestos while the poorer countries increasing it. Rich countries have the option to migrate their hazardous industries to poorer neighbors, a move that the poor will welcome. Thus, Asia represents the true story of asbestos: the rich have had enough and stopped or curtailed it drastically, while the poor need to have more, howsoever reluctantly. Summary of Asbestos use in Asia As asbestos demand shrinks in the West, exporters are developing new markets in Asia. The richer Asian countries are declining their consumption of all types of asbestos – with Singapore having touched zero point. On the other hand, cash-strapped Asian nations are increasing consumption of white asbestos, probably drawing false solace from the theory that this type of asbestos is less toxic. Even if one were to defy informed opinion and lend some credence to this theory, prospects in the poorer Asian countries remain grim because of no or woefully inadequate enforcement of precautionary and protective measures. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)